When did we long for the sheltered gloom
Of the older game with its
cautious odds?
Gloried we always in sun and room,
Spending our strength like
the younger gods.
By the wild, sweet ardor that ran in us,
By the pain that tested the man in us,
By the shadowy springs and
the glaring sand,
You were our true-love, young,
young land.
Badger
CLARK
Spring came to the Bad Lands in fits
and numerous false starts, first the “chinook,”
uncovering the butte-tops between dawn and dusk, then
the rushing of many waters, the flooding of low bottom-lands,
the agony of a world of gumbo, and, after a dozen
boreal setbacks, the awakening of green things and
the return of a temperature fit for human beings to
live in. Snow buntings came in March, flocking
familiarly round the cow-shed at the Maltese Cross,
now chittering on the ridge-pole, now hovering in
the air with quivering wings, warbling their loud,
merry song. Before the snow was off the ground,
the grouse cocks could be heard uttering their hollow
booming. At the break of morning, their deep,
resonant calls came from far and near through the
clear air like the vibrant sound of some wind instrument.
Now and again, at dawn or in the early evening, Roosevelt
would stop and listen for many minutes to the weird,
strange music, or steal upon the cocks where they
were gathered holding their dancing rings, and watch
them posturing and strutting about as they paced through
their minuet.
The opening of the ground and
it was occasionally not unlike the opening of a trap-door brought
work in plenty to Roosevelt and his friends at the
Maltese Cross. The glades about the water-holes
where the cattle congregated became bogs that seemed
to have no bottom. Cattle sank in them and perished
unless a saving rope was thrown in time about their
horns and a gasping pony pulled them clear. The
ponies themselves became mired and had to be rescued.
It was a period of wallowing for everything on four
feet or on two. The mud stuck like plaster.
Travel of every sort was hazardous
during early spring, for no one ever knew when the
ground would open and engulf him. Ten thousand
wash-outs, a dozen feet deep or thirty, ran “bank-high”
with swirling, merciless waters, and the Little Missouri,
which was a shallow trickle in August, was a torrent
in April. There were no bridges. If you
wanted to get to the other side, you swam your horse
across, hoping for the best.
At Medora it was customary, when the
Little Missouri was high, to ride to the western side
on the narrow footpath between the tracks on the trestle;
and after the Marquis built a dam nearby for the purpose
of securing ice of the necessary thickness for use
in his refrigerating plant, a venturesome spirit now
and then guided his horse across its slippery surface.
It happened one day early in April that Fisher was
at the river’s edge, with a number of men, collecting
certain tools and lumber which had been used in the
cutting and hauling of the ice, when Roosevelt, riding
Manitou, drew up, with the evident intention of making
his way over the river on the dam. The dam, however,
had disappeared. The ice had broken up, far up
the river, and large cakes were floating past, accumulating
at the bend below the town and raising the water level
well above the top of the Marquis’s dam.
The river was what Joe Ferris had a way of calling
“swimmin’ deep for a giraffe.”
“Where does the dam start?” asked Roosevelt.
“You surely won’t try
to cross on the dam,” exclaimed Fisher, “when
you can go and cross on the trestle the way the others
do?”
“If Manitou gets his feet on
that dam,” Roosevelt replied, “he’ll
keep them there and we can make it finely.”
“Well, it’s more than
likely,” said Fisher, “that there’s
not much of the dam left.”
“It doesn’t matter, anyway.
Manitou’s a good swimmer and we’re going
across.”
Fisher, with grave misgivings, indicated
where the dam began. Roosevelt turned his horse
into the river; Manitou did not hesitate.
Fisher shouted, hoping to attract
the attention of some cowboy on the farther bank who
might stand ready with a rope to rescue the venturesome
rider. There was no response.
On the steps of the store, however,
which he had inherited from the unstable Johnny Nelson,
Joe Ferris was watching the amazing performance.
He saw a rider coming from the direction of the Maltese
Cross, and it seemed to him that the rider looked like
Roosevelt. Anxiously he watched him pick his
way out on the submerged dam.
Manitou, meanwhile, was living up
to his reputation. Fearlessly, yet with infinite
caution, he kept his course along the unseen path.
Suddenly the watchers on the east bank and the west
saw horse and rider disappear, swallowed up by the
brown waters. An instant later they came in sight
again. Roosevelt flung himself from his horse
“on the downstream side,” and with one
hand on the horn of the saddle fended off the larger
blocks of ice from before his faithful horse.
Fisher said to himself that if Manitou
drifted even a little with the stream, Roosevelt would
never get ashore. The next landing was a mile
down the river, and that might be blocked by the ice.
The horse struck bottom at the extreme
lower edge of the ford and struggled up the bank.
Roosevelt had not even lost his glasses. He laughed
and waved his hand to Fisher, mounted and rode to Joe’s
store. Having just risked his life in the wildest
sort of adventure, it was entirely characteristic
of him that he should exercise the caution of putting
on a pair of dry socks.
Joe received him with mingled devotion
and amazement. “Landsake, man!” he
cried, “weren’t you afraid?”
“I was riding Manitou,”
Roosevelt responded quietly. “Just,”
exclaimed Joe later, “as though Manitou was
a steam engine.” He bought a new pair of
socks, put them on, and proceeded on his journey.
Fisher saw him shortly after and accused
him of being reckless.
“I suppose it might be considered
reckless,” Roosevelt admitted. “But
it was lots of fun.”
Roosevelt spent his time alternately
at the two ranches, writing somewhat and correcting
the proofs of his new book, but spending most of his
time in the saddle. The headquarters of his cattle
business was at the Maltese Cross where Sylvane Ferris
and Merrifield were in command. Elkhorn was,
for the time being, merely a refuge and a hunting-lodge
where Sewall and Dow “ran” a few hundred
cattle under the general direction of the more experienced
men of the other “outfit.”
At the Maltese Cross there were now
a half-dozen hands, Sylvane and “our friend
with the beaver-slide,” as Merrifield, who was
bald, was known; George Myers, warm-hearted and honest
as the day; Jack Reuter, known as “Wannigan,”
with his stupendous memory and his Teutonic appetite;
and at intervals “old man” Thompson who
was a teamster, and a huge being named Hank Bennett.
Roosevelt liked them all immensely. They possessed
to an extraordinary degree the qualities of manhood
which he deemed fundamental, courage, integrity,
hardiness, self-reliance, combining with
those qualities a warmth, a humor, and a humanness
that opened his understanding to many things.
He had come in contact before with men whose opportunities
in life had been less than his, and who in the eyes
of the world belonged to that great mass of “common
people” of whom Lincoln said that “the
Lord surely loved them since he made so many of them.”
But he had never lived with them, day in, day out,
slept with them, eaten out of the same dish with them.
The men of the cattle country, he found, as daily companions,
wore well.
They called him “Mr. Roosevelt,”
not “Theodore” nor “Teddy.”
For, though he was comrade and friend to all, he was
also the “boss,” and they showed him the
respect his position and his instinctive leadership
merited. More than once a man who attempted to
be unduly familiar with Roosevelt found himself swiftly
and effectively squelched. He himself entered
with enthusiasm into the work of administration.
He regarded the ranch as a most promising business
venture, and felt assured that, with ordinary luck,
he should make his livelihood from it. On every
side he received support for this assurance.
The oldest cattleman as well as the youngest joined
in the chorus that there never had been such a country
for turning cattle into dollars. In the Territorial
Governor’s Report for 1885, Packard is quoted,
waxing lyric about it:
Bunch and buffalo-grass cover almost
every inch of the ground. The raw sides
of buttes are the only places where splendid
grazing cannot be found. On many of the buttes,
however, the grass grows clear to the summit,
the slopes being the favorite pasture-lands of
the cattle. Generally no hay need be cut,
as the grass cures standing, and keeps the cattle
in as good condition all winter as if they were stall-fed.
The only reason for putting up hay is to avoid a scarcity
of feed in case of heavy snow. This very seldom
happens, however, as very little snow falls in
the Bad Lands. A curious fact with cattle
is that the ones that have been here a year or
two, and know how to rustle, will turn away from
a stack of hay, paw away the snow from the grass,
and feed on that exclusively. Even in the
dead of winter a meadow has a very perceptible
tinge of green.
A realist might have remarked that
very little snow fell in the Bad Lands mainly because
the wind would not let it. The Cowboy editor’s
exultant optimism has an aspect of terrible irony in
the light of the tragedy that was even then building
itself out of the over-confidence of a hundred enthusiasts.
Bill Sewall and Will Dow alone remained skeptical.
Perhaps we are wrong [Sewall wrote
his brother], but we think it is too cold and
barren for a good cattle country. Nobody
has made anything at it yet. All expect to.
Guess it’s very much like going into the
woods in fall. All are happy, but the
drive is not in yet. When it does get in,
am afraid there will be a shortness somewhere.
The men that furnish the money are not many of
them here themselves and the fellows that run
the business and are supposed to know, all look
for a very prosperous future, consider the troubles
and discouragements, losses, etc., temporary.
They are like us getting good and
sure pay.
Roosevelt recognized the possibility
of great losses; but he would have been less than
human if in that youthful atmosphere of gorgeous expectation
he had not seen the possibilities of failure less vividly
than the possibilities of success. Sylvane and
Merrifield were confident that they were about to
make their everlasting fortunes; George Myers invested
every cent of his savings in cattle, “throwing
them in,” as the phrase went, with the herd of
the Maltese Cross. In their first year the Maltese
Cross “outfit” had branded well over a
hundred calves; the losses, in what had been a severe
winter, had been slight. It was a season of bright
hopes. Late in April, Roosevelt sent Merrifield
to Minnesota with Sewall and Dow and a check for twelve
thousand five hundred dollars to purchase as many more
head of stock as the money would buy.
Roosevelt, meanwhile, was proving
himself as capable as a ranchman as he was courageous
as an investor. The men who worked with him noted
with satisfaction that he learned quickly and worked
hard; that he was naturally progressive; that he cared
little for money, and yet was thrifty; that, although
conferring in all matters affecting the stock with
Sylvane and Merrifield, and deferring to their experience
even at times against his own judgment, he was very
much the leader. He was never “bossy,”
they noted, but he was insistent on discipline, on
regularity of habits, on prompt obedience, on absolute
integrity.
He was riding over the range one day
with one of his ablest cowpunchers, when they came
upon a “maverick,” a two-year-old steer,
which had never been branded. They lassoed him
promptly and built a fire to heat the branding-irons.
It was the rule of the cattlemen that
a “maverick” belonged to the ranchman
on whose range it was found. This particular steer,
therefore, belonged, not to Roosevelt, but to Gregor
Lang, who “claimed” the land over which
Roosevelt and his cowboy were riding. The Texan
started to apply the red-hot iron.
“It is Lang’s brand a thistle,”
said Roosevelt.
“That’s all right, boss,” answered
the cowboy. “I know my business.”
“Hold on!” Roosevelt exclaimed
an instant later, “you are putting on my brand.”
“That’s all right. I always put on
the boss’s brand.”
“Drop that iron,” said
Roosevelt quietly, “and go to the ranch and get
your time. I don’t need you any longer.”
The cowpuncher was amazed. “Say,
what have I done? Didn’t I put on your
brand?”
“A man who will steal for
me will steal from me. You’re fired.”
The man rode away. A day or so
later the story was all over the Bad Lands.
Roosevelt was scarcely more tolerant
of ineffectiveness than he was of dishonesty.
When a man was sent to do a piece of work, he was expected
to do it promptly and thoroughly. He brooked no
slack work and he had no ear for what were known as
“hard-luck stories.” He gave his orders,
knowing why he gave them; and expected results.
If, on the other hand, a man “did his turn”
without complaint or default, Roosevelt showed himself
eager and prompt to reward him.
His companions saw these things, and
other things. They saw that “the boss”
was quick-tempered and impatient of restraint; but
they saw also that in times of stress the hot-headed
boy seemed instantly to grow into a cautious and level-headed
man, dependable in hardship and cool in the face of
danger. He was, as one of them put it, “courageous
without recklessness, firm without being stubborn,
resolute without being obstinate. There was no
element of the spectacular in his make-up, but an
honest naturalness that won him friends instantly.”
“Roosevelt out in Dakota was
full of life and spirit, always pleasant,” said
Bill Sewall in after years. “He was hot-tempered
and quick, but he kept his temper in good control.
As a rule, when he had anything to say, he’d
spit it out. His temper would show itself in the
first flash in some exclamation. In connection
with Roosevelt I always think of that verse in the
Bible, ’He that ruleth his spirit is greater
than he that taketh a city.’”
“He struck me like a sort of
rough-an’-ready, all-around frontiersman,”
said “Dutch Wannigan.” “Wasn’t
a bit stuck up just the same as one of
the rest of us.”
Joe Ferris, who frankly adored Roosevelt,
declared to a crowd at his store one day, “I
wouldn’t be surprised if Roosevelt would be
President.”
His hearers scoffed at him. “That
fool Joe Ferris,” remarked one of them at his
own ranch that night, “says that Roosevelt will
be President some day.”
But Joe held his ground.
The neighbors up and down the river
were warm-hearted and friendly. Mrs. Roberts
had decided that she wanted a home of her own, and
had persuaded her husband to build her a cabin some
three miles north of the Maltese Cross, where a long
green slope met a huge semi-circle of gray buttes.
The cabin was primitive, being built of logs stuck,
stockade-fashion, in the ground, and the roof was only
dirt until Mrs. Roberts planted sunflowers there and
made it a garden; but for Mrs. Roberts, with her flock
of babies, it was “home,” and for many
a cowboy, passing the time of day with the genial
Irishwoman, it was the nearest approach to “home”
that he knew from one year’s end to another.
Shortly after Mrs. Roberts had moved
to her new house, Roosevelt and Merrifield paid her
a call. Mrs. Roberts, who had the only milch cow
in the Bad Lands, had been churning, and offered Roosevelt
a glass of buttermilk. He drank it with an appreciation
worthy of a rare occasion. But as he rode off
again, he turned to Merrifield with his teeth set.
“Heavens, Merrifield!”
he exclaimed, “don’t you ever do that again!”
Merrifield was amazed. “Do what?”
“Put me in a position where
I have to drink buttermilk. I loathe the stuff!”
“But why did you drink it?”
“She brought it out!”
he exclaimed, “And it would have hurt her feelings
if I hadn’t. But look out! I don’t
want to have to do it again!”
Mrs. Roberts spared him thenceforward,
and there was nothing, therefore, to spoil for Roosevelt
the merriment of the Irishwoman’s talk and the
stimulus of her determination and courage. There
were frequent occasions consequently when “the
boys from the Maltese Cross” foregathered in
the Roberts cabin, and other occasions, notably Sundays
(when Sylvane and Merrifield and George Myers had picked
up partners in Medora) when they all called for “Lady
Roberts” as chaperon and rode up the valley
together. They used to take peculiar delight
in descending upon Mrs. Cummins and making her miserable.
It was not difficult to make that
poor lady unhappy. She had a fixed notion of
what life should be for people who were “nice”
and “refined,” and her days were a succession
of regrets at the shortcomings of her neighbors.
She was in many ways an admirable woman, but she seemed
incapable of extending the conception of gentility
which a little Pennsylvania town had given her, and
she never caught a gleam of the real meaning of the
life of which she was a part. She wanted everything
in the Bad Lands exactly as she had had it at home.
“Well,” as Mrs. Roberts subsequently remarked,
“she had one time of it, I’m telling you,
in those old rough days.”
Mrs. Cummins was not the only neighbor
who furnished amusement during those spring days of
1885 to the boys at the Maltese Cross. The Eatons’
“dude ranch” had developed in a totally
unexpected direction. From being a headquarters
for Easterners who wanted to hunt in a wild country,
it had become a kind of refuge to which wealthy and
distracted parents sent such of their offspring as
were over-addicted to strong drink. Why any parent
should send a son to the Bad Lands with the idea of
putting him out of reach of temptation is beyond comprehension.
The Eatons did their part nobly and withheld intoxicating
drinks from their guests, but Bill Williams and the
dozen or more other saloon-keepers in Medora were
under no compulsion to follow their example.
The “dudes” regularly came “back
from town” with all they could carry without
and within; and the cowboys round about swore solemnly
that you couldn’t put your hand in the crotch
of any tree within a hundred yards of the Eatons’
ranch-house without coming upon a bottle concealed
by a dude being cured of “the drink.”
The neighbors who were most remote
from Roosevelt in point of space continued to be closest
in point of intimacy. The Längs were now
well established and Roosevelt missed no opportunity
to visit with them for an hour or a day, thinking
nothing apparently of the eighty-mile ride there and
back in comparison with the prospect of an evening
in good company. The Längs were, in fact,
excellent company. They knew books and they knew
also the graces of cultivated society. To visit
with them was to live for an hour or two in the quietude
of an Old World home, with all the Old World’s
refinements and the added tang of bizarre surroundings;
and even to one who was exuberantly glad to be a cowboy,
this had its moments of comfort after weeks of the
rough frontier existence. Cultivated Englishmen
were constantly appearing at the Längs’,
sent over by their fathers, for reasons sometimes
mysterious, to stay for a week or a year. Some
of them proved very bad cowboys, but all of them were
delightful conversationalists. Their efforts
to enter into the life of the Bad Lands were not always
successful, and Hell-Roaring Bill Jones on one notable
occasion, when the son of a Scotch baronet undertook
to criticize him for misconduct, expressed his opinion
of the scions of British aristocracy that drifted
into Medora, in terms that hovered and poised and struck
like birds of prey. Lincoln Lang, who was present,
described Bill Jones’s discourse as “outside
the pale of the worst I have ever heard uttered by
human mouth,” which meant something in that particular
place. But Bill Jones was an Irishman, and he
was not naturally tolerant of idiosyncrasies of speech
and manner. Roosevelt, on the whole, liked the
“younger sons,” and they in turn regarded
him with a kind of awe. He was of their own class,
and yet there was something in him which stretched
beyond the barriers which confined them, into regions
where they were lost and bewildered, but he was completely
at home.
They all had delightful evenings together
at Yule, with charades and punning contests, and music
on the piano which Lincoln Lang had brought out through
the gumbo against all the protests of nature.
Mrs. Lang was an admirable cook and a liberal and
hospitable hostess, which was an added reason for
riding eighty miles.
To the Scotch family, exiled far up
the Little Missouri, Roosevelt’s visits were
notable events. “We enjoyed having him,”
said Lincoln Lang long afterward, “more than
anything else in the world.”
To Gregor Lang, Roosevelt’s
visits brought an opportunity for an argument with
an opponent worthy of his steel. The Scotchman’s
alert intelligence pined sometimes, in those intellectually
desolate wastes, for exercise in the keen give-and-take
of debate. The average cowboy was not noted for
his conversational powers, and Gregor Lang clutched
avidly at every possibility of talk. It was said
of him that he loved a good argument so much that
it did not always make much difference to him which
side of the argument he took. On one occasion
he was spending the night at the Eatons’, when
the father of the four “Eaton boys” was
visiting his sons. “Old man” Eaton
was a Republican; Lang was a Democrat. They began
arguing at supper, and they argued all night long.
To Eaton, his Republicanism was a religion (as it was
to many in those middle eighties), and he wrestled
with the error in Lang’s soul as a saint wrestles
with a devil. As the day dawned, Gregor Lang
gave an exclamation of satisfaction. “It’s
been a fine talk we’ve had, Mistur-r Eaton,”
he cried. “Now suppose you tak’ my
side and I tak’ yours?” What Eaton said
thereupon has not been recorded; but Gregor Lang went
home happy.
With all his love for forensics as
such, Lang had solid convictions. They were a
Democrat’s, and in consequence many of them were
not Roosevelt’s. Roosevelt attacked them
with energy and Lang defended them with skill.
Roosevelt, who loved rocking-chairs, had a way of
rocking all over the room in his excitement. The
debates were long, but always friendly; and neither
party ever admitted defeat. The best that Gregor
Lang would say was, “Well, Mr. Roosevelt, when
you ar-re Pr-resident of the United States, you
may r-run the gover-rnment the way you mind to.”
He did admit in the bosom of his family, however,
that Roosevelt made “the best ar-rgument for
the other side” he had ever heard.
Lang’s love of an argument,
which to unfriendly ears might have sounded like contentiousness,
did not serve to make the excellent Scotchman popular
with his neighbors. He had a habit, moreover,
of saying exactly what he thought, regardless of whom
he might hit. He was not politic at all.
He had, in fact, come to America and to Dakota too
late in life altogether to adapt a mind, steeped in
the manners and customs of the Old World, to the new
conditions of a country in almost every way alien
to his own. He was dogmatic in his theories of
popular government and a little stubborn in his conviction
that there was nothing which the uneducated range-rider
of the Bad Lands could teach a thinking man like him.
But his courage was fine. Against the protests
of his Southern neighbors, he insisted on treating
a negro cowboy in his outfit as on complete equality
with his white employees; and bore the storm of criticism
with equanimity. Such a spirit was bound to appeal
to Roosevelt.
At the Maltese Cross there was a steady
stream of callers. One of them, a hawk-eyed,
hawk-nosed cowpuncher named “Nitch” Kendley,
who was one of the first settlers in the region, arrived
one day when Roosevelt was alone.
“Come on in,” said Roosevelt,
“and we’ll have some dinner. I can’t
bake biscuits, but I can cook meat. If you can
make the biscuits, go ahead, and I will see what I
can do for the rest of the dinner.”
So “Nitch” made the biscuits
and put them in the oven, and Roosevelt cut what was
left of a saddle of venison and put it in a pan to
fry. Then the two cooks went outdoors, for the
cabin was small, and the weather was hot.
Roosevelt began to talk, whereupon
“Nitch,” who had ideas of his own, began
to talk also with a fluency which was not customary,
for he was naturally a taciturn man. They both
forgot the dinner. “Nitch” never
knew how long they talked.
They were brought back to the world
of facts by a smell of burning. The cabin was
filled with smoke, and “you could not,”
as “Nitch” subsequently remarked, “have
told your wife from your mother-in-law three feet
away.” On investigation it proved that “Nitch’s”
biscuits and Roosevelt’s meat were burnt to
cinders.
Merrifield and Sylvane were out after
deer, and Roosevelt and his companion waited all afternoon
in vain for the two men to return. At last, toward
evening, Roosevelt made some coffee, which, as “Nitch”
remarked, “took the rough spots off the biscuits.”
“If we’d talked less,”
reflected “Nitch,” “we’d have
had more dinner.”
Roosevelt laughed. He did not
seem to mind the loss of a meal. “Nitch”
was quite positive that he was well repaid. They
went on talking as before.