ABBEYLEIX, Sunday, Fe. Newtown-Stewart,
through which I drove yesterday afternoon with Lord
Ernest to the train, is a prettily situated town,
with the ruins of a castle in which James II. slept
for a night on his flight to France. He was cordially
received, and by way of showing his satisfaction left
the little town in flames when he departed. Here
appears to be a case, not of rack-renting, but of
absenteeism. The town belongs to a landlord who
lives in Paris, and rarely, if ever, comes here.
There are no improvements no sanitation but
the inhabitants make no complaint. “Absenteeism”
has its compensations as well as its disadvantages.
They pay low rents, and are little troubled; the landlord
drawing, perhaps, L400 a year from the whole place.
The houses are small, though neat enough in appearance,
but the town has a sleepy, inert look. On the
railway between Dundalk and Newry, we passed a spot
known by the ominous name of “The Hill of the
Seven Murders,” seven agents having been murdered
there since 1840! I suppose this must be set
down to the force of habit. At Newry a cavalry
officer whom Lord Ernest knew got into our carriage.
He was full of hunting, and mentioned a place to which
he was going as a “very fine country.”
“From the point of view of the picturesque?”
I asked.
“Oh no! from the point of view of falling off
your horse!”
At Maple’s Hotel I found a most
hospitable telegram, insisting that I should give
up my intention of spending the night at Maryborough,
and come on to this lovely place in my host’s
carriage, which would be sent to meet me at that station.
I left Kingsbridge Station in Dublin about 7 P.M.
We had rather a long train, and I observed a number
of people talking together about one of the carriages
before we started; but there was no crowd at all,
and nothing to attract special attention. As we
moved out of the station, some lads at the end of the
platform set up a cheer. We ran on quietly till
we reached Kildare. There quite a gathering awaited
our arrival on the platform, and as we slowed up, a
cry went up from among them of, “Hurrah for Mooney!
hurrah for Mooney!” The train stopped just as
this cry swelled most loudly, when to my surprise
a tall man in the gathering caught one or two of the
people by the shoulder, shaking them, and called out
loudly, “Hurrah for Gilhooly you
fools, hurrah for Gilhooly!”
This morning I learned that I had
the honour, unwittingly, of travelling from Dublin
to Maryborough with Mr. Gilhooly, M.P., who appears
to have been arrested in London on Friday, brought
over yesterday by the day train, and sent on at once
from Dublin to his destined dungeon.
An hour’s drive through a rolling
country, showing white and weird under its blanket
of snow in the night, brought us to this large, rambling,
delightful house, the residence of Viscount de
Vesci. Mr. Gladstone came here from Lord
Meath’s on his one visit to Ireland some years
ago. I find the house full of agreeable and interesting
people; and the chill of the drive soon vanished under
the genial influences of a light supper, and of pleasant
chat in the smoking-room. A good story was told
there, by the way, of Archbishop Walsh, who being rather
indiscreetly importuned to put his autograph on a
fan of a certain Conservative lady well known in London,
and not a little addicted to lion-hunting, peremptorily
refused, saying, “no, nor any of the likes of
her!” And another of Father Nolan, a well-known
priest, who died at the age of ninety-seven.
When someone remonstrated with him on his association
with an avowed unbeliever in Christianity, like Mr.
Morley, Father Nolan replied, “Oh, faith will
come with time!” The same excellent priest,
when he came to call on Mr. Gladstone, here at Abbeyleix,
on his arrival from the Earl of Meath’s, pathetically
and patriarchally adjured him, on his next visit to
Ireland, “not to go from one lord’s house
to another, but to stay with the people.”
This was better than the Irish journal which, finding
itself obliged to chronicle the fact that Mr. Gladstone,
with his wife and daughter, was visiting Abbeyleix,
gracefully observed that he “had been entrapped
into going there!” Some one lamenting the lack
of Irish humour and spirit in the present Nationalist
movement, as compared with the earlier movements,
Lord de Vesci cited as a solitary but refreshing
instance of it, the incident which occurred the other
day at an eviction in Kerry, of a patriotic priest
who chained himself to a door, and put it across the
entrance of the cabin to keep out the bailiffs!
It is discouraging to know that this
delightful act was bitterly denounced by some worthy
and well-meaning Tory in Parliament as an “outrage”!
Despite the snow the air this morning,
in this beautiful region, is soft and almost warm,
and all the birds are singing again. The park
borders upon and opens into the pretty town of Abbeyleix,
the broad and picturesque main thoroughfare of which,
rather a rural road than a street, is adorned with
a fountain and cross, erected in memory of the late
Lord de Vesci. There is a good Catholic
chapel here (the ancient abbey which gave the place
its name stood in the grounds of the present mansion),
and a very handsome Protestant Church.
It is a curious fact that two of the
men implicated in the Phoenix Park murders had been
employed, one, I believe, as a mason, and one as a
carver, in the construction of this church. Both
the chapel and the church to-day were well attended.
I am told there has been little real trouble here,
nor has the Plan of Campaign been adopted here.
Sometimes Lord de Vesci finds threatening
images of coffins and guns scratched in the soil,
with portraits indicating his agent or himself; but
these mean little or nothing. Lady de Vesci,
who loves her Irish home, and has done and is doing
a good deal for the people here, tells me, as an amusing
illustration of the sort of terrorism formerly established
by the local organisations, that when she met two
of the labourers on the place together, they used
to pretend to be very busy and not to see her.
But if she met one alone, he greeted her just as respectfully
as ever.
The women here do a great deal of
embroidery and lace work, in which she encourages
them, but this industry has suffered what can only
be a temporary check, from the change of fashion in
regard to the wearing of laces. Why the loveliest
of all fabrics made for the adornment of women should
ever go “out of fashion” would be amazing
if anything in the vagaries of that occult and omnipotent
influence could be. The Irish ladies ought to
circulate Madame de Piavigny’s exquisite Lime
d’Heures, with its incomparable illustrations
by Carot and Meaulle, drawn from the lace work of
all ages and countries, as a tonic against despair
in respect to this industry. In one of the large
rooms of her own house, Lady de Vesci has established
and superintends a school of carving for the children
of poor tenants. It has proved a school of civilisation
also. The lads show a remarkable aptitude for
the arts of design, and of their own accord make themselves
neat and trim as soon as they begin to understand
what it is they are doing. They are always busy
at home with their drawings and their blocks, and some
of them are already beginning to earn money by their
work.
What I have seen at Adare Manor near
Limerick, where the late Earl of Dunraven educated
all the workmen employed on that mansion as stone-cutters
and carvers, suffices to show that the people of this
country have not lost the aptitudes of which we see
so many proofs in the relics of early Irish art.
Among the guests in the house is a
distinguished officer, Colonel Talbot, who saw hard
service in Egypt, and in the advance on Khartoum,
with camels across the desert a marvellous
piece of military work. I find that he was in
America in 1864-65, with Meade and Hunt and Grant
before Petersburg, being in fact the only foreign officer
then present. He there formed what seem to me
very sound and just views as to the ability of the
Federal commanders in that closing campaign of the
Civil War, and spoke of Hunt particularly with much
admiration. Of General Grant he told me a story
so illustrative of the simplicity and modesty which
were a keynote in his character that I must note it.
The day before the evacuation of Petersburg by the
Con federates, Grant was urged to order an attack
upon the Confederate positions. He refused to
do so. The next day the Confederates were seen
hastily abandoning them. Grant watched them quietly
for a while, and then putting down his glass, said
to one of the officers who had urged the assault, “You
were right, and I was wrong. I ought to have
attacked them.”
It is provoking to know that the notes
taken by this British officer at that time, being
sent through the Post Office by him some years ago
to Edinburgh for publication, were lost in the transmission,
and have never been recovered. Curiously enough,
however, he thinks he has now and then discerned indications
in articles upon the American War, published in a
newspaper which he named, going to show that his manuscripts
are in existence somewhere.
ABBEYLEIX, Monday, Fe. To-day,
in company with Lord de Vesci and a lady,
I went over to Kilkenny. We left and arrived in
a snowstorm, but the trip was most interesting.
Kilkenny, chiefly known in America, I fear, as the
city of the cats, is a very picturesque place, thanks
to its turrets and towers. It has two cathedrals,
a Bound Tower (one of these in Dublin was demolished
in the last century!), a Town Hall with a belfry,
and looming square and high above the town, the Norman
keep of its castle. The snow enlivened rather
than diminished the scenic effect of the place.
Bits of old architecture here and there give character
to the otherwise commonplace streets. Notable
on the way to the castle is a bit of mediaeval wall
with Gothic windows, and fretted with the scutcheon
in stone of the O’Sheas. The connection
of a gentleman of this family with the secret as well
as the public story of the Parnellite movement may
one day make what Horace Greeley used to call “mighty
interestin’ reading.” A dealer in
spirits now occupies what is left of the old Parliament
House of Kilkenny, in which the rival partisans of
Preston and O’Neill outfought the legendary cats,
to the final ruin of the cause of the Irish confederates,
and the despair of the loyal legate of Pope Innocent.
Of Kilkenny Castle, founded by Strongbow,
but two or three towers remain. The great quadrangle
was rebuilt in 1825, and much of it again so late
as in 1860. There is little, therefore, to recall
the image of the great Marquis who, if Rinuccini read
him aright, played so resolutely here two centuries
and a half ago for the stakes which Edward Bruce won
and lost at Dundalk. The castle of the Butlers
is now really a great modern house.
The town crowds too closely upon it,
but the position is superb. The castle windows
look clown upon the Nore, spanned by a narrow ancient
bridge, and command, not only all that is worth seeing
in the town, but a wide and glorious prospect over
a region which is even now beautiful, and in summer
must be charming.
Over the ancient bridge the enterprise
of a modern brewer last week brought a huge iron vat,
so menacingly ponderous that the authorities made
him insure the bridge for a day.
Within the castle, near the main entrance,
are displayed some tapestries, which are hardly shown
to due advantage in that position. They were
made here at Kilkenny in a factory established by Piers
Butler, Earl of Ormonde, in the sixteenth century,
and they ought to be sent to the Irish Exhibition
of this year in London, as proving what Irish art
and industry well directed could then achieve.
They are equally bold in design and rich in colour.
The blues are especially fine.
The grand gallery of the castle, the
finest in the kingdom, though a trifle narrow for
its length, is hung with pictures and family portraits.
One of the most interesting of these is a portrait
of the black Earl of Ormon’de, a handsome swarthy
man, evidently careful of his person, who was led
by that political flirt, Queen Elizabeth, to believe
that she meant to make him a visit in Ireland, and,
perhaps, to honour him with her hand. He went
to great expenses thereupon. At a parley with
his kinsman, the Irish chieftain O’Moore of Abbeyleix,
this black earl was traitorously captured, and an
ancient drawing representing this event hangs beneath
his portrait.
The muniment room, where, thanks to
Lord Ormonde’s courtesy, we found everything
prepared to receive us, is a large, airy, and fire-proof
chamber, with well-arranged shelves and tables for
consulting the records. These go back to the
early Norrnan days, long before Edward III. made James
Butler Earl of Ormonde, upon his marriage with Alianore
of England, granddaughter of Edward I. The Butlers
came into Ireland with Henry II., and John gave them
estates, the charters of some of which, with the seals
annexed, are here preserved. There are fine specimens
of the great seals also of Henry III., and of his sons
Edward I. and Edmund Crouchback, and of the Tudor
sovereigns, as well as many private seals of great
interest. The wax of the early seals was obviously
stronger and better than the wax since used. Of
Elizabeth, who came of the Butler blood through her
mother, one large seal in yellow wax, attached to
a charter dated Oc, 1565, is remarkable for the
beauty of the die. The Queen sits on the obverse
under a canopy; on the reverse she rides in state
on a pacing steed as in her effigy at the Tower of
London. The seals of James I. follow the design
of this die. Two of these are particularly fine.
At the Restoration something disappears of the old
stateliness. A seal of Charles II., of 1660, very
large and florid in style, shows the monarch sitting
very much at his ease, with one knee thrown negligently
over the other. Many of the private letters and
papers of the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries,
during which Kilkenny, as it had been often before,
was a great centre of Irish politics and intrigues,
have been bound up in volumes, and the collection
has been freely drawn upon by historians. But
it would obviously bear and reward a more thorough
co-ordination and examination than it has ever yet
received.
There is a curious Table Book here
preserved of Charles I. while at Oxford in 1644, from
which it appears that while the colleges were melting
up their plate for the King, his Majesty fared better
than might have been expected. His table was
served with sixty pounds of mutton a day; and he wound
up his dinner regularly with “sparaguss”
so long as it lasted, and after it went out with artichokes.
An Expense Book, too, of the great
Marquis, after he became the first Duke of Ormonde,
Colonel Blood’s Duke, kept at Kilkenny in 1668
throws some interesting light on the cost of living
and the customs of great houses at that time.
The Duke, who was in some respects the greatest personage
in the realm, kept up his state here at a weekly cost
of about L50, a good deal less allowing
for the fall in the power of the pound sterling than
it would now cost him to live at a fashionable London
hotel. He paid L9, 10s. a week for the keep of
nineteen horses, 18 shillings board wages for three
laundry-maids, and L1, 17d. for seven dozen of
tallow-candles. The wines served at the ducal
table were Burgundy, Bordeaux, “Shampane,”
Canary, “Renish,” and Portaport, the last
named at a shilling a bottle, while he paid no more
than L3, 18s. for six dozen bottles of Bordeaux, and
L1, 1s. for a dozen and a half of “Shampane.”
This of course was not the sparkling beverage which
in our times is the only contribution of Champagne
to the wine markets of the world, for the Ay Mousseux
first appears in history at the beginning of the eighteenth
century. It was the red wine of Champagne, which
so long contested the palm with the vintages of Burgundy.
St. Evremond, who with the Comte d’Olonne and
the great gourmets of the seventeenth century
thought Champagne the best, as the Faculty of Paris
also pronounced it the most wholesome of wines, doubtless
introduced his own religion on the subject into England but
the entry in the Duke’s Expense Book of 1668
is an interesting proof that the duel of the vintages
was even then going as it finally went in favour of
Burgundy. While the Duke got his Champagne for
1d. a bottle, he had to pay twenty shillings a
dozen, or 1d. a bottle, for five dozen of Burgundy.
He got his wines from Dublin, which then, as long before,
was the most noted wine mart of Britain. The
English princes drew their best supplies thence in
the time of Richard II.
From the castle we drove through the
snow to the Cathedral of St. Canice, a grand and simple
Norman edifice of the twelfth century, now the Church
of the Protestant bishop. An ancient Round Tower
of much earlier date stands beside it like a campanile,
nearly a hundred feet in height.
There is a legend that Rinuccini wanted
to buy and carry away one of the great windows of
this Cathedral, in which mass was celebrated while
he was here. The Cathedral contains some interesting
monuments of the Butlers, and there are many curiously
channelled burial slabs in the floor, like some still
preserved in the ruins of Abbeyleix. Lord de
Vesci pointed out to me several tombs of families
of English origin once powerful here, but now sunk
into the farmer class. On one of these I think
it was that we saw a remarkably well-preserved effigy
of a lady, wearing a plaited cap under a “Waterford
cloak” one of the neatest varieties
of the Irish women’s cloak garment
so picturesque at once, and so well adapted to the
climate, that I am not surprised to learn from Lady
de Vesci that it is very fast going out of fashion.
This morning before we left Abbeyleix she showed us
two such cloaks, types from two different provinces,
each in its way admirable. Put on and worn about
the room by two singularly stately and graceful ladies,
they fell into lines and folds which recalled the
most exquisitely beautiful statuettes of Tanagra;
and all allowance made for the glamour lent them by
these two “daughters of the gods, divinely tall,”
it was impossible not to see that no woman could possibly
look commonplace and insignificant in such a garment.
Yet Lady de Vesci says that more than once she
has known peasant women, to whom such cloaks had been
presented, cut off the characteristic and useful hood,
and trim the mangled robe with tawdry lace. So
it is all over the world! Women who are models
for an artist when they wear some garment indigenous
to their country and appropriate to its conditions,
prefer to make guys of themselves in grotesque travesties
of the latest “styles” from London and
Paris and Dublin!
Kilkenny boasts that its streets are
paved with marble. It is in fact limestone, but
none the worse for that. The snow did not improve
them. So without going on a pilgrimage to the
Kilkenny College, at which Swift, Congreve, and Farquhar, an
odd concatenation of celebrities were more
or less educated, we made our way to the Imperial
Hotel for luncheon. The waiter was a delightful
Celt. Upon my asking him whether the house could
furnish anything distantly resembling good Irish whisky,
he produced a bottle of alleged Scotch whisky, which
he put upon the table with a decisive air, exclaiming,
“And this, yer honour, is the most excellent
whisky in the whole world, or I’m not an Irishman!”
Urged by the cold we tempered it with
hot water and tasted it. It shut us up at once
to believe the waiter a Calmuck or a Portuguese anything,
in short, but an Irishman. It is an extraordinary
fact that, so far, the whisky I have found at Irish
hotels has been uniformly quite execrable. I
am almost tempted to think that the priests sequestrate
all the good whisky in order to discourage the public
abuse of it, for the “wine of the country”
which they offer one is as uniformly excellent.
Kilkenny ought to be and long was
a prosperous town. In 1702, the second Duke of
Ormonde made grants (at almost nominal ground-rents)
of the ground upon which a large portion of the city
of Kilkenny was then standing, or upon which houses
have since been built.
These grants have passed from hand
to hand, and form the “root of title”
of very many owners of house property in Kilkenny.
The city is the centre of an extensive agricultural
region, famous, according to an ancient ditty, for
“fire without smoke, air without fog, water without
mud, and land without bog”; but of late it has
been undeniably declining. For this there are
many reasons. The railways and the parcel-post
diminish its importance as a local emporium. The
almost complete disappearance of the woollen manufacture,
the agricultural depression which has made the banks
and wholesale houses “come down” upon
the small dealers, and the “agitation,”
bankrupting or exiling the local gentry, have all
conspired to the same result.
From Abbeyleix station we walked back
to the house through the park under trees beautifully
silvered with the snow. At dinner the party was
joined by several residents of the county. One
of them gave me his views of the working of the “Plan
of Campaign.” It is a plan, he maintains,
not of defence as against unjust and exacting landlords,
but of offence against “landlordism,”
not really promoted, as it appears to be, in the interest
of the tenants to whose cupidity it appeals, but worked
from Dublin as a battering engine against law and
order in Ireland. Every case in which it is applied
needs, he thinks, to be looked into on its own merits.
It will then be found precisely why this or that spot
has bees selected by the League for attack. At
Luggacurren, for instance, the “Plan of Campaign”
has been imposed upon the tenants because the property
belongs to the Marquis of Lansdowne, who happens to
be Governor-General of Canada, so that to attack him
is to attack the Government. The rents of the
Lansdowne property at Luggacurren, this gentleman
offers to prove to me, are not and never have been
excessive; and Lord Lansdowne has expended very large
sums on improving the property, and for the benefit
of the tenants. Two of the largest tenants having
got into difficulties through reckless racing and other
forms of extravagance found it convenient to invite
the league into Luggacurren, and compel other tenants
in less embarrassed circumstances to sacrifice their
holdings by refusing to pay rents which they knew to
be fair, and were abundantly able and eager to pay.
At Mitchelstown the “Plan of Campaign”
was aimed again, not at the Countess of Kingston, the
owner, but at the Disestablished Protestant Church
of Ireland, the trustees of which hold a mortgage
of a quarter of a million sterling on the estates.
On the Clanricarde property in Galway the “Plan
of Campaign” has been introduced, my informant
says, because Lord Clanricarde happens to be personally
unpopular. “Go down to Portumna and Woodford,”
he said, “and look into the matter for yourself.
You will find that the rents on the Clanricarde estates
are in the main exceptionally fair, and even low.
The present Marquis has almost never visited Ireland,
I believe, and he is not much known even in London.
People who dislike him for one reason or another readily
believe anything that is said to his disadvantage
as a landlord. Most people who don’t like
the cut of Dr. Fell’s whiskers, or the way in
which he takes soup, are quite disposed to listen
to you if you tell them he beats his wife or plays
cards too well. The campaigners are shrewd fellows,
and they know this, so they start the ‘Plan
of Campaign’ on the Portumna properties, and
get a lot of English windbags to come there and hobnob
with some of the most mischievous and pestilent parish
priests in all Ireland and then you have
the dreadful story of the ‘evictions,’
and all the rest of it. Lord Clanricarde, or
his agent, or both of them, getting out of temper,
will sit down and do some hasty or crabbed or injudicious
thing, or write a provoking letter, and forthwith it
is enough to say ‘Clanricarde,’ and all
common sense goes out of the question, to the great
damage, not so much of Lord Clanricarde for
he lives in London, and is a rich man, and, I suppose,
don’t mind the row but of landlords
all over Ireland, and therefore, in the long-run,
of the tenants of Ireland as well.”
At Luggacurren, this gentleman thinks,
the League is beaten. There are eighty-two tenants
there, evicted and living dismally in what is called
the Land League village, a set of huts erected near
the roadside, while their farms are carried on for
the owner by the Land Corporation. As they were
most of them unwilling to accept the Plan, and were
intimidated into it for the benefit of the League,
and of the two chief tenants, Mr. Dunn and Mr. Kilbride,
men of substance who had squandered their resources,
the majority of the evicted are sore and angry.
“At first each man was allowed
L3 a month by the League for himself and his family.
But they found that Mr. Kilbride, who has been put
into Parliament by Mr. Parnell for Kerry, a county
with which he has no more to do than I have with the
Isle of Skye, was getting L5 a week, and so they revolted,
and threatened to bolt if their subsidy was not raised
to L4 a month.”
“And this they get now? Out of what funds?”
“Out of the League funds, or,
in other words, out of their own and other people’s
money, foolishly put by the tenants into the keeping
of the League to ‘protect’ it! They
give it the kind of ‘protection’ that
Oliver gave the liberties of England: once they
get hold of it, they never let go!”
I submitted that at Gweedore Father
M’Fadden had paid over to Captain Hill the funds
confided to him.
“No doubt; but there the landlord
gave in, and the more fool he!”
With another guest I had an interesting
conversation about the Ulster tenant-right, which
got itself more or less enacted into British law only
in 1870, and of which Mr. Froude tells me he sought
in vain to discover the definite origin. “The
best lawyers in Ireland” could give him no light
on this point. He could only find that it did
not exist apparently in 1770, but did exist apparently
twenty years later. The gentleman with whom I
talked to-night tells me that the custom of Ulster
was really once general throughout Ireland, and is
called the “Ulster” custom, only because
it survived there after disappearing elsewhere.
There is a tradition too, he says, in Ulster that the
recognition of this tenant-right as a binding custom
there is really due to Lord Castlereagh. It would
be a curious thing, could this be verified, to find
Lord Castlereagh, whose name has been execrated in
Ireland for fourscore years, recommending and securing
a century ago that recognition of the interest of
the Irish tenant in his holding, which, in our time,
Mr. Gladstone, just now the object of Irish adulation,
was, with much difficulty and reluctance, brought
to accord in the Compensation for Disturbances clause
of his Act of 1870!
Of this clause, too, I am told to-night
that the scale of compensation fixed for the awards
of the Court in the third section of it was devised
(though Mr. Gladstone did not know this) by an Irish
member in the interest of the “strong farmers,”
who wish to root out the small farmers. There
is an apparent confirmation of this story in the fact
that under this section the small farmers, under L10,
may be awarded against the landlord seven years’
rent as compensation for disturbance, while the number
of years to be accounted for in the award diminishes
as the rental increases, a discrimination not unlikely
to strengthen the preference of the landlords for
the large farm system.